
DC MATH HUB
The DC Math Hub, a cross-sector initiative, integrates the latest educational research with innovative classroom practices to unlock the full potential of all students in mathematics.
DC is the most improved state in math since 2022!
The latest update (February 2025) of the Education Recovery Scorecard, which tracks academic progress in school districts across the country, has identified DC as a state and DC Public Schools (DCPS) as standouts making significant strides in student achievement and pandemic recovery. The scorecard, which utilizes a rigorous methodology to measure changes in test scores from 2019 to 2024, found that DC students demonstrated impressive gains from 2022 to 2024 that outpaced every other state nationwide. According to the national study’s press release: “The District of Columbia ranked 1st among states in terms of recovery in math between 2022 and 2024 and 1st in reading between 2022 and 2024.”
Latest DC Math Hub Updates
The Math4All DC coalition is hosting a screening of Counted Out, a new math education documentary on Pi Day
March 14, 2025
OSSE’s statewide Math Task Force, a group of educators and experts who will develop recommendations so that all DC students achieve proficiency in math, met to discuss professional learning strategies.
February 18, 2025
The updated Education Recovery Scorecard finds that DC is the most improved state in math achievement since 2022!
February 11, 2025
OSSE launched a new Math Task Force, bringing together DC educators and educational leaders for a strategic effort aimed at rapidly accelerating math proficiency across the District.
October 7, 2024
EmpowerK12 (EK12) and the DC Education Research Collaborative host the first ever DC Math Summit, a standing room only event where more than 150 educators learned best practices from national experts and local bright spot teachers.
April 5, 2024
EK12 launches the DC Math Hub and releases our first Math Bright Spots report in partnership with Center City PCS, the DC Deputy Mayor for Education, DC International PCS, DC Public Schools, Friendship PCS, and the Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
March 14, 2024
DC’s Bright Spot Schools for Math Growth
In 2024, EK12 identified 38 DC public schools with the highest math growth for our city’s lowest-performing student groups. Our team interviewed and surveyed math instructional leaders for a report, Problem Solving Math Education in the District: Strategies for a Brighter Math Future 2024, that highlighted five key evidence-based strategies these schools utilize to accelerate math learning:
-
Bright Spot schools’ educators, students, families, and communities believe in universal math potential, and that everyone can be a “math person” with the right support and relevant material.
The award-winning teachers and Bright Spot school instructional leaders who spoke with us described how, with the right support, all students can access and master grade-level material, build procedural fluency, develop complex problem-solving and critical thinking skills, and become “math people.”
Decades of rigorous research confirm what Bright Spot educators believe: all students can learn mathematics when they have access to high-quality mathematics instruction and are given sufficient time and support to master a challenging curriculum.
Many schools follow UnboundEd's GLEAM framework (Grade-Level, Engaging, Affirming, and Meaningful) for math instruction, which provides a holistic approach to teaching that is more than just technical actions or skills. The framework focuses on educator mindset and planning to ensure that instruction provides all students with grade-level content that engages and affirms their identities and experiences.
-
Bright Spots utilize daily and weekly scheduling and data to ensure students receive real-time support and intervention.
A major challenge to accelerating students’ math growth is maximizing the amount of effective math instructional time each student receives. Part of that calculus for DC’s Bright Spot educators is to ensure every student is exposed to high-quality, grade-level instruction while receiving individualized opportunities to improve their skills. Educators use student data and intentional scheduling of math and intervention blocks, including opportunities for small group, blended learning, and one-on-one tutoring, during the regular school day to address this challenge.
The award-winning teachers we interviewed for this report attribute some of their success to having daily intervention classes or blocks in the schedule to bring students up to speed. They utilize every available minute with intentionality to practice math skills, integrate problem solving across the curriculum, and provide more time for creative instruction.
Bright Spot schools use assessments for multiple purposes, well beyond informing educators about student learning and progress. In their classrooms, students receive the results from assessments quickly, accelerating their ability to correct student- and classroom-level misconceptions immediately.
-
Bright Spot schools implement high-quality curriculum with collaborative district-level support and supplement with personalized learning platforms to accelerate learning instead of remediating.
Instructional coherence focuses on the alignment of curricula, educator professional development, student assessments, and accountability systems to high academic standards. For math learners, this means that the conceptual and procedural strategies for learning a math skill are aligned across days, weeks, and years. It also means concepts are aligned across different types of instruction -- offered by lead teachers, as well as support provided through interventions, tutoring, and other individualized practice.
A coherent approach from the system to the classroom level, inclusive of curriculum, professional development, and observation tools, can improve student achievement by 0.14 standard deviations on the state test. At the classroom level, a large-scale longitudinal study in Kentucky found statistically significantly greater improvement in math achievement for struggling students when intervention initiatives focused on both the quality of pull-out intervention and coherence between pull-out intervention and classroom instruction, suggesting the alignment of daily lessons and student interventions may be more important than simply choosing an evidence-based intervention strategy. Moreover, instructional coherence can enhance student motivation, engagement, and self-regulation, as well as teacher collaboration and professional.
Bright Spot educators use curriculum that is designed to let students discover, inquire, predict, explain, share, and explore. Just like mathematical content, problem solving must be actively taught; curricula and instructional materials must make space and time to build those skills just as they make time to teach addition or algebra. Educators reported that they implement Eureka Math, Illustrative Math, and Building Blocks as their core curriculum along with online supplemental learning platforms from i-Ready Learning, Zearn, and Teach to One Roadmaps. Each of these curricula and tools meet the standard for being considered high quality by Ed Reports, a nonprofit curriculum and tools review organization.
-
Math instructional time prioritizes conceptual understanding and blends in procedural knowledge with math fact fluency to build mathematical thinkers.
Effective math teaching does not adopt the “drill-and-kill” tactics that were pervasive in classrooms most of us attended when we were kids. Nearly every DC Bright Spot school instructional leadership team and math teacher interviewed for our report discussed the importance of integrating conceptual and procedural knowledge using examples and problems with which their students could identify.
Before students can learn how to perform mathematical procedures, they need to understand the concepts and ideas behind them. Teaching procedures and concepts together in ways that make sense to students helps them learn math better and faster.
When we interviewed Burroughs Elementary, a Bright Spot school for math growth, we learned about their weekly practice of having teachers deliver upcoming math lessons with a coach and fellow teachers present. Their peers provide feedback about the possible student misconceptions that could result from the lesson and how they can adjust to improve. Several other Bright Spot DCPS elementary schools shared about a similar practice in interviews for our report.
Similarly, teachers come together at KIPP Promise once a week on Tuesdays for “math meeting,” a very structured and supportive environment where teachers prepare their lessons for the next five days. Prior to joining the meeting, each teacher completes all the upcoming assignments, independent practice activities, and exit tickets themselves. They discuss the big ideas of upcoming math lessons, scale the rigor of each proposed lesson from high to low, and identify the common misconceptions that may arise together. During the day they analyze exit ticket data, diving into students constructed responses and scratch work, to formulate a plan to reteach or accelerate learning using the intervention block later in the afternoon.
-
To limit student misconceptions, Bright Spot instructional leadership teams provide ongoing support for teacher implementation of curriculum and conceptual understanding.
Bright Spot teacher panels were asked the most effective support they have received, as well as what their peers might need to improve. These are topics they raised as promising practices:
Have more than one person in the classroom at a time. Some schools include math coaches, specialists, or interventionists in the classroom to provide individualized or small group instruction in classes where students have a wide range of understanding. Others use co-teachers or rotating teacher teams, especially for teachers who are new to the profession or school. Not only does this give students the attention they need, but it also creates consistency in instruction—if one teacher is absent, there’s no interruption to learning.
Allow and encourage educators to be flexible and innovative. Bright Spots educators have the time and ability to make decisions, choose tools, and adapt curricula and instructional materials.
Develop skills and content knowledge but use “person power” wisely. All the Bright Spot teachers are experts in their content. Some use professional development during the summer and some during the school year, but all report that constantly pursuing knowledge and skills is essential to their practice.
Plan ahead, and plan together. Making, executing, and adapting daily lesson plans takes a lot of preparation and planning. On top of that, Bright Spot teachers have strategic long-term plans, which they report is key to keeping them organized and making sure they can cover the content, leave time for students to practice new skills, and discover where re-teaching is needed – all while building fluency and problem-solving skills along the way. Educators at Bright Spots engage in collaborative planning across grade level and content teams, or even with other schools if their grade-level team is small.
This six-minute short film with interviews of teachers and students at three of the 2024 Bright Spots for Math Growth to learn more about their promising practices.
Learn More About the 2024 DC Bright Spot Schools for Math Growth!
Math Hub Resources
-
Council of the Great City Schools. (2021). How Well Do Large City Public Schools Overcome the Effects of Poverty and Other Barriers?
National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). PISA 2022 Mathematics Literacy Results.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2012). Closing the Opportunity Gap in Mathematics Education.
-
National Education Recovery Scorecard showing progress in math performance for grades 3-8
DC Office of the State Superintendent of Education. (2022). 2022 DC State Plan Accountability Addendum.
DC Policy Center. (2024). 2022-23 State of DC Schools: Challenges to pandemic recovery in a new normal.
District of Columbia Public Schools. (2023). A Capital Commitment: 2023-2028 Strategic Plan.
District of Columbia Public Schools. (2024). Early learning curriculum & assessment.
Zearn. (2023). Students in District of Columbia Public Schools gained an additional 11 weeks of math learning in one year with Zearn.
-
Conceptual Understanding, Procedural Knowledge, and Math Fact Fluency
Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School. Teachers College Record, 110(3): 608-645. Retrieved from https://ed.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/boaler__staples_2008_tcr.pdf
Geary, D.C., Hoard, M.K., Nugent L., & Bailey, D.H. (2013). Adolescents’ Functional Numeracy Is Predicted by Their School Entry Number System Knowledge. PLoS ONE 8(1): e54651.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2023). Procedural Fluency: Reasoning and Decision-Making, Not Rote Application of Procedures Position. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Standards_and_Positions/Position_Statements/PROCEDURAL_FLUENCY.pdf
Osana, H.P., and Pitsolantis, N. (2013). “Addressing the Struggle to Link Form and Understanding in Fractions Instruction.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 83 (March): 29–56.
Woodward, J. (2006). Developing automaticity in multiplication facts: integrating strategy instruction with timed practice drills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29(4): 269-289.
High-Quality Instructional Materials, Deployed Coherently EdReports. (2024). Reviews of K-12 instructional materials. Retrieved from https://www.edreports.org/reports/math
McGee, D.L., Gonulates, F., Hodgson, T., & Brewer, M. (2020). The long term impact of a coherence based model for mathematics intervention. School Science and Mathematics, 120(4), 220-231.
Narechania, K. (2022). Instructional coherence isn’t a trendy reform. It’s necessary—and it works. Fordham Institute Flypaper. Retrieved from https://fordhaminstitute.org/national/commentary/instructional-coherence-isnt-trendy-reform-Its-necessary-and-it-works
Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional Program Coherence: What It Is and Why It Should Guide School Improvement Policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4): 297-321. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023004297
O'Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K–12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78(1): 33-84.
TNTP & Zearn. (2021). Accelerate Don’t Remediate: New Evidence from Elementary Math Classrooms. Retrieved from https://tntp.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/TNTP_Accelerate_Dont_Remediate_FINAL.pdf
Mathematical Mindset and Confidence
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset The New Psychology Of Success. Random House.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2012). Closing the Opportunity Gap in Mathematics Education. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Standards_and_Positions/Position_Statements/Opportunity%20Gap.pdf
Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It's ok — Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3): 731–737.
Wu, Y. (2016). Universal Beliefs and Specific Practices: Students’ Math Self-Efficacy and Related Factors in the United States and China. International Education Studies, 9(12): 61-74. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1121512.pdf
Student Scheduling and Data
Biesinger, K. D., Crippen, K. J., & Muis, K. R. (2008). The impact of block scheduling on student motivation and classroom practice in mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(3): 140-147.
Higgins Averill, O., Baker, D., & Rinaldi, C. (2014). A Blueprint for Effectively Using RTI Intervention Block Time. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50(1): 29-38.
Institute for Educational Sciences. (2009). Using Student Achievement Data to Support Instructional Decision Making. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/dddm_pg_092909.pdf
Teacher Preparation and Ongoing Development
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED606743.pdf
Goertz, M. E., Olah, L. N., & Riggan, M. (2009). From testing to teaching: The use of interim assessments in classroom instruction. Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2): 371-406.
National Council on Teacher Quality. (2022). Preparation for Teaching Elementary Mathematics. Retrieved from https://www.nctq.org/dmsView/NCTQ_Teacher_Prep_Review_Preparation_for_Teaching_Elementary_Mathematics_2022
DC Math Summit Materials
-
Jorge Granados, DC International School
-
Emily Strohbeck and Dr. Kate Merrill, Center City Public Charter Schools
-
Cathy Richardson, Washington International School
-
Michael Dorh, Ron Brown High School (DCPS)
-
Carly Klinenberg, DC International School
-
Darco Brown, DC International School
-
Tereasa Sowers – Franklin, Anacostia High School (DCPS)
-
Glen Russell, Georgetown Day School
About the DC Math Hub
EmpowerK12 facilitates a growing coalition of DC education agencies and researchers collaborating to revolutionize mathematics education across the District of Columbia and the nation. Our team fundamentally believes that math and data skills will be a fundamental part of the future workforce, and we want students from historically underrepresented groups to have the opportunity to thrive, which is why we took a leadership role to organize experts and educators.
By fostering a partnership between DCPS, DC public charter schools, and the DC Educational Research Collaborative, the Hub catalyzes innovative, evidence-based instructional strategies to accelerate math growth.